Marie Bergstr\u00f6m<\/p>\n
“Quand l’Ined rencontre Meetic. L’apport des donn\u00e9es massives \u00e0 la sociologie du couple”.<\/p>\n
Abstract:<\/strong> L\u2019usage des sites et des applications de rencontres s\u2019est beaucoup diffus\u00e9 en France au cours des quinze derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es. Ces services sont non seulement un objet d\u2019\u00e9tude \u00e9mergent pour la sociologie, ils fournissent aussi de nouvelles donn\u00e9es d\u2019analyse sous forme de \u00ab\u00a0big data\u00a0\u00bb. Tr\u00e8s diff\u00e9rentes des donn\u00e9es d\u2019enqu\u00eates, autour desquelles la sociologie du couple s\u2019est largement constitu\u00e9e, elles permettent de revisiter les th\u00e9ories classiques du \u00ab\u00a0choix du conjoint\u00a0\u00bb. \u00c0 partir d\u2019une \u00e9tude confrontant des donn\u00e9es de\u00a0Meetic \u00e0 la derni\u00e8re enqu\u00eate sur la formation des couples en France (\u00ab\u00a0\u00c9pic\u00a0\u00bb, Ined-Insee, 2013), la pr\u00e9sentation illustre quelques-unes des opportunit\u00e9s offertes par lesdites \u00ab donn\u00e9es massives \u00bb, ainsi que les points aveugles de l\u2019approche quantitative conventionnelle. Pour ce faire, on se base sur une \u00e9tude concr\u00e8te consacr\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9cart d\u2019\u00e2ge entre conjoints dont l\u2019objectif \u00e9tait de comprendre comment cette asym\u00e9trie sexu\u00e9e se produit.<\/span><\/p>\n Biography :<\/strong> Marie Bergstr\u00f6m ist a sociologist. She is work as a researcher at Institut national d\u2019\u00e9tudes d\u00e9mographiques (Ined).\u00a0Her research focuses on the sexuality, the conjugality and the celibacy. <\/p>\n Article\u00a0: <\/span><\/strong>Bergstr\u00f6m M.<\/b> (2018<\/b>), \u00ab\u00a0De quoi l\u2019\u00e9cart d\u2019\u00e2ge est-il le nombre\u202f? L\u2019apport des big data \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tude de la diff\u00e9rence d\u2019\u00e2ge au sein des couples\u00a0\u00bb, Revue Fran\u00e7aise de sociologie<\/i>, vol.\u00a059, pp.\u00a0395\u2011422.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The seminar aims to develop current reflections about the use of digital data in the analysis of online practices and forms of participation. With the explosion of online communication, a richer and greater amount of information has become available to researchers to document practices in a variety of domains: consumption, political behavior, production of knowledge, sociability, democratic participation, controversy, etc. Evidence of practices and of communication occurring in these domains are now available on various media: forum, discussions lists, blogs, online press, social networks, dedicated exchange platforms, etc. Over the last few years, the use of these data for research purposes has become widespread but there is still little debate on the compilation of corpora, the methods of analysis and the articulation between digital analyses and more classical fieldwork in social science.<\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n